<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mythbusting &#8211; Collective Code Ownership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2008/05/mythbusting-c.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2008/05/mythbusting-c.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mythbusting-c</link>
	<description>Best practices for your goals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 03:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Campbell</title>
		<link>http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2008/05/mythbusting-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilepainrelief.com/2008/05/mythbusting-c/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Since we&#039;re busting myths, I will say that it is *not* necessary to practice pair-programming to achieve collective code ownership.   We managed just fine without that - all that was necessary was that multiple people simultaneously worked on the same areas of functionality.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we&#8217;re busting myths, I will say that it is *not* necessary to practice pair-programming to achieve collective code ownership.   We managed just fine without that &#8211; all that was necessary was that multiple people simultaneously worked on the same areas of functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Levison</title>
		<link>http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2008/05/mythbusting-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Levison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilepainrelief.com/2008/05/mythbusting-c/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Steve - hoisted on my own petard. I should have said that in my limited experience in enviroments that pair programming isn&#039;t used I&#039;ve found that we&#039;ve had trouble with CCO. If you&#039;ve been able to pull it off then well done and you have a good counter point.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8211; hoisted on my own petard. I should have said that in my limited experience in enviroments that pair programming isn&#8217;t used I&#8217;ve found that we&#8217;ve had trouble with CCO. If you&#8217;ve been able to pull it off then well done and you have a good counter point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilja Preuß</title>
		<link>http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2008/05/mythbusting-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilja Preuß</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilepainrelief.com/2008/05/mythbusting-c/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also like to add that CCO does *not* mean that I have to be able to work equally well on every line of code in a one million LOC project. It means that when I see code that needs improvement, &quot;it&#039;s not *my* code&quot; is not a valid excuse to leave it as is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also like to add that CCO does *not* mean that I have to be able to work equally well on every line of code in a one million LOC project. It means that when I see code that needs improvement, &#8220;it&#8217;s not *my* code&#8221; is not a valid excuse to leave it as is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

