<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t use Network Attached Storage for backups &#8211; save your $$$</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2007/09/using-network-a.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2007/09/using-network-a.html</link>
	<description>Best practices for your goals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wynkoop</title>
		<link>http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2007/09/using-network-a.html/comment-page-1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wynkoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilepainrelief.com/2007/09/using-network-a/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>I came up with about $17 per year to run the unit.

From Buffalo&#039;s site: Average 17 W (with no USB devices connected)

I used formula from:

http://www.anapsid.org/electricitycost.html

17 x 24 hours/day = 408 watts
408 divided by 1000 = .408 Kwh
.408 x 0.12 = $0.04896/day
$0.04896/day x 365 = $17.8704/year



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came up with about $17 per year to run the unit.</p>
<p>From Buffalo&#8217;s site: Average 17 W (with no USB devices connected)</p>
<p>I used formula from:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.anapsid.org/electricitycost.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.anapsid.org/electricitycost.html</a></p>
<p>17 x 24 hours/day = 408 watts<br />
408 divided by 1000 = .408 Kwh<br />
.408 x 0.12 = $0.04896/day<br />
$0.04896/day x 365 = $17.8704/year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwayne King</title>
		<link>http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2007/09/using-network-a.html/comment-page-1#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwayne King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilepainrelief.com/2007/09/using-network-a/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

Not sure that it&#039;ll make a difference given your experience, but I also struggled with the same thing (after getting tired of paying almost $200/yr for my online backups).  I ended up with a Lacie 500Gb network drive, but the key determining factor here is that I got the Gigabit model.  At around the same time I also switched my home network to gigabit and that made a huge difference.  I can now move 5Gb video files fairly efficiently.

For me the biggest difference was when I got a gigabit switch for my internal network, which really sped things up.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>Not sure that it&#8217;ll make a difference given your experience, but I also struggled with the same thing (after getting tired of paying almost $200/yr for my online backups).  I ended up with a Lacie 500Gb network drive, but the key determining factor here is that I got the Gigabit model.  At around the same time I also switched my home network to gigabit and that made a huge difference.  I can now move 5Gb video files fairly efficiently.</p>
<p>For me the biggest difference was when I got a gigabit switch for my internal network, which really sped things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Levison</title>
		<link>http://agilepainrelief.com/notesfromatooluser/2007/09/using-network-a.html/comment-page-1#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Levison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilepainrelief.com/2007/09/using-network-a/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Robert - thanks for the reply. I appear to have overestimated a bit. However using a borrowed Kill-a-Meter (http://the-gadgeteer.com/review/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review) and measured the decives usage. Its using a bit more than suggested. In my short test it used &gt; 30 watts (not including startup). So my original post inflated my costs - but not intentionally.

Thanks for pointing out my error.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert &#8211; thanks for the reply. I appear to have overestimated a bit. However using a borrowed Kill-a-Meter (<a href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/review/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review" rel="nofollow">http://the-gadgeteer.com/review/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review</a>) and measured the decives usage. Its using a bit more than suggested. In my short test it used > 30 watts (not including startup). So my original post inflated my costs &#8211; but not intentionally.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out my error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
