Don’t use Network Attached Storage for backups – save your $$$

BuffaloLinkStationLast year I decide to fix the backup problem in our house. They happened so rarely they were almost useless. After some research I bought a Buffalo Link Station to attach to the network. Think of it as a harddrive with a network card – you plug it into the network, turn it on, install from software on your computers. Now you have a network harddrive. 

Mistake

What a mistake. Its slow, noisy and sucks back electricity like it’s going out of style. The original plan – leave it on all the time and just run scheduled backups from our machines. The problem: If left on 24/7 it consumes so (>$100/yr) worth of electricity. Result: We never turn it on.

What a mistake. Its slow, noisy and sucks back electricity like it’s going out of style. The original plan – leave it on all the time and just run scheduled backups from our machines. The problem: If left on 24/7 it consumes so (>$100/yr) worth of electricity. Result: We never turn it on. Even when it is on it runs so slowly as Networked storage that a full backup of 50+ gigabytes takes over a day. Nutsss. In end it gets used as an expensive USB drive. BTW the performance isn’t a network issue its the device itself. 

My Solution?

Mozy. For $50/yr I get online backup. It uses Volume Shadow Copy so even files that are in use get backed up. It’s simple, it just installs and works. It took me less than 5 minutes to get started. The downsides: 

  • We need one license for each computer in the family. (unless I back everything up to server – but then we’re using more electricity again). 
  • Bandwidth limits kill – it took about 10 days to do our initial 45 gigabyte backup. I shudder to think how long a restoring the whole thing would take (perhaps 2-4 days). Sadly only a faster internet connection is ever going to solve this problem.
Be Sociable, Share!

Related posts:

  1. Hard drive backup? Tired of the corrupt NTBackups! Want something simpler that just works?
  2. Carbonite Online Backup
  3. Lightroom Tip: How to Successfully Import your Photoshop Elements Catalog
  4. Software Development Carnival
  5. Nightmare with Sears Canada or when to purchase an extended warranty?

Certified ScrumMaster TrainingIf you enjoyed this post take a look at Certified ScrumMaster Training. We currently have courses scheduled in Ottawa and Edmonton.


  • Robert Wynkoop

    I came up with about $17 per year to run the unit.

    From Buffalo’s site: Average 17 W (with no USB devices connected)

    I used formula from:

    http://www.anapsid.org/electricitycost.html

    17 x 24 hours/day = 408 watts
    408 divided by 1000 = .408 Kwh
    .408 x 0.12 = $0.04896/day
    $0.04896/day x 365 = $17.8704/year

  • Dwayne King

    Hi Mark,

    Not sure that it’ll make a difference given your experience, but I also struggled with the same thing (after getting tired of paying almost $200/yr for my online backups). I ended up with a Lacie 500Gb network drive, but the key determining factor here is that I got the Gigabit model. At around the same time I also switched my home network to gigabit and that made a huge difference. I can now move 5Gb video files fairly efficiently.

    For me the biggest difference was when I got a gigabit switch for my internal network, which really sped things up.

  • http://www.notesfromatooluser.com Mark Levison

    Robert – thanks for the reply. I appear to have overestimated a bit. However using a borrowed Kill-a-Meter (http://the-gadgeteer.com/review/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review) and measured the decives usage. Its using a bit more than suggested. In my short test it used > 30 watts (not including startup). So my original post inflated my costs – but not intentionally.

    Thanks for pointing out my error.